Parallel Session 4A (Day 2 – 11.00-12.00)


Luca Follis (Lancaster University): Framing digital incapacity: penal technology, carceral circuitry and the logic of control

Technology is revolutionizing policing. It is not just the influx of personal body cameras or the near ubiquity of mobile computing and digitized paperwork. License plate readers, predictive policing algorithms and drone units are increasingly routine aspects of police work in many jurisdictions.  Police departments maintain a visible, active presence on social media as points of public contact, crisis response tools and as intelligence gathering sites. Yet on the carceral side of the justice continuum, the security challenges new technologies present overshadow their prosocial or even institutional applications. Within prisons, technology is often understood and framed in terms of its control functions or its security implications and not its potential positive social and resettlement elements. Indeed, a key problematic for administrators is stemming the clandestine flow of mobile phones and intercepting the flight patterns of courier drones delivering drugs. And even on the administrative side, technology infrastructure is fragmented, decentralized and arcane. Offender managers, probation staff, and community rehabilitation company workers shuffle between a variety of software platforms with varying degrees of access and information about prisoner sentence plans, their risk levels and their resettlement needs. This paper draws on UK prison fieldwork and official documents to problematize the widening digital gulf between prisons, their charges and the rest of the criminal justice system. It argues that even as calls for prison reform and penal abolition become part of mainstream policy debates, new forms of digital exclusion and technological incapacity are increasingly unrecognized and undertheorized facets of the carceral experience.


Christophe Mincke (NICC, Brussels): The carceral and mobile segregation. On the effect of digital technologies

We regret that, for personal reasons, Christophe Mincke will not be able to attend the conference.


Neil Waghorn (Aberystwyth University): Prisons, Resistance and the Rise of Narco-Drone

Slides

Recent years have seen drones proliferate across the civilian sphere for a wide range of applications, some beneficial, others, somewhat more nefarious. This paper takes the utilisation of the drone as a tool to smuggle contraband into prisons as its inspiration; using the narco-drone as a tool to explore the use of smuggling of contraband and how it can viewed as a form of resistance within power relationships of the prison. In doing so, the paper also explores the variety of ways in which the prison, and the wider state, is attempting to counter the use of drones in this manner, outlining the successes and limitations of these current efforts, and proposed potential options. This nefarious application of drones, accompanied with potential counter-measures also allows for a discussion regarding the porous nature of the prison boundary and how the emergence of aerial mobility ensures the conceptualisation of (prison) territory as volumetric.